What the investigation does
The investigation weighs British strengths against German mistakes to explain the battle’s outcome without turning into a narrative chronology.
What the examiner response highlights
Mirrored explanatory sections create a direct causal comparison and keep the writing focused on the research question.
Evidence about aircraft, radar, production, intelligence and leadership is repeatedly tied back to the central judgment.
Source origin, author experience and possible bias affect how competing historical claims are weighted.
What to examine critically
History topics must concern events sufficiently far in the past, and counterfactual questions remain inappropriate.
Current work should make the research method explicit and use a deliberate range of primary and scholarly secondary sources.
How to use this example
Study the decisions behind the work: how the question is narrowed, what counts as evidence in this subject, how the line of argument develops, and where the evaluation becomes specific. Do not copy its wording, structure or method as a template.
Assessment changes for first examination in May 2027 redesign the criteria around the essay framework, knowledge and understanding, analysis and argument, discussion and evaluation, and reflection. Always check the requirements for your own session.
Read the evidence behind this breakdown
Open the available archived material, then return to the guide to compare the examiner's comments with the choices made in the essay.
Find the official source
The underlying essay belongs to an IB-published legacy collection. Access it through the IB Store or the Programme Resource Centre if your school provides access.
IB Extended Essay resources ↗Current Extended Essay updates ↗